Comments on: Joe’s WTF of the week http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/ Words from the hands of Joseph Southan Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-81 truranp Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:36:42 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-81 sup guys, i was wondering if one of you could record the adverts on the radio about email and msn on your phone, with the computer and phone talking. i believe there are 3 versions of it, and if possible can you record them off the radio with a line in input to the comp and send me them plz? cheers :P sup guys,

i was wondering if one of you could record the adverts on the radio about email and msn on your phone, with the computer and phone talking. i believe there are 3 versions of it, and if possible can you record them off the radio with a line in input to the comp and send me them plz? cheers :P

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-5229 truranp Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:36:00 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-5229 sup guys, i was wondering if one of you could record the adverts on the radio about email and msn on your phone, with the computer and phone talking. i believe there are 3 versions of it, and if possible can you record them off the radio with a line in input to the comp and send me them plz? cheers :P sup guys,

i was wondering if one of you could record the adverts on the radio about email and msn on your phone, with the computer and phone talking. i believe there are 3 versions of it, and if possible can you record them off the radio with a line in input to the comp and send me them plz? cheers :P

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-80 truranp Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:28:58 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-80 and here is Joe's basic summary, the long one doesn't show up here: Starting page: http://www.southanuk.co.uk/ Started at: 01:24:43 GMT, October 01, 2006 Time taken: 45 seconds Validator Version: v3.5.0 Total links checked: 101 Total errors found: 67 Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN and here is Joe’s basic summary, the long one doesn’t show up here:

Starting page: http://www.southanuk.co.uk/
Started at: 01:24:43 GMT, October 01, 2006
Time taken: 45 seconds
Validator Version: v3.5.0
Total links checked: 101
Total errors found: 67
Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-79 truranp Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:28:14 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-79 from the random board: Starting page: http://www.------.org Started at: 01:21:53 GMT, October 01, 2006 Time taken: 38 seconds Validator Version: v3.5.0 Total links checked: 99 Total errors found: 617 Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN from the random board:

Starting page: http://www.——.org
Started at: 01:21:53 GMT, October 01, 2006
Time taken: 38 seconds
Validator Version: v3.5.0
Total links checked: 99
Total errors found: 617
Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-5227 truranp Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:28:00 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-5227 from the random board: Starting page: http://www.------.org Started at: 01:21:53 GMT, October 01, 2006 Time taken: 38 seconds Validator Version: v3.5.0 Total links checked: 99 Total errors found: 617 Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN from the random board:

Starting page: http://www.——.org
Started at: 01:21:53 GMT, October 01, 2006
Time taken: 38 seconds
Validator Version: v3.5.0
Total links checked: 99
Total errors found: 617
Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-5228 truranp Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:28:00 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-5228 and here is Joe's basic summary, the long one doesn't show up here: Starting page: http://www.southanuk.co.uk/ Started at: 01:24:43 GMT, October 01, 2006 Time taken: 45 seconds Validator Version: v3.5.0 Total links checked: 101 Total errors found: 67 Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN and here is Joe’s basic summary, the long one doesn’t show up here:

Starting page: http://www.southanuk.co.uk/
Started at: 01:24:43 GMT, October 01, 2006
Time taken: 45 seconds
Validator Version: v3.5.0
Total links checked: 101
Total errors found: 67
Actual DTD used for this page: -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-78 truranp Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:22:17 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-78 brb guys, gonna validate that site with cats and mudkips, the name of which cannot be spoken brb guys, gonna validate that site with cats and mudkips, the name of which cannot be spoken

]]> By: truranp http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-5226 truranp Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:22:00 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-5226 brb guys, gonna validate that site with cats and mudkips, the name of which cannot be spoken brb guys, gonna validate that site with cats and mudkips, the name of which cannot be spoken

]]> By: Dark Fire http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Dark Fire Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:31:36 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-76 Ah...Validation...I think that the validation sites are a load of rubbish. Just as people can understand incorrect uses of english, computers can easily cope with code that does not follow the rules 100% of the time. My policy is that if code works in Firefox and Internet Explorer, it doesn't need changing - even if it is officially 'invalid'. In fact, some code I used in my old website was invalid but had essential effects on the pages in Internet Explorer and Firefox. In conclusion, do not treat what validation sites tell you as absolutely correct - they are more like a guide. Ah…Validation…I think that the validation sites are a load of rubbish. Just as people can understand incorrect uses of english, computers can easily cope with code that does not follow the rules 100% of the time. My policy is that if code works in Firefox and Internet Explorer, it doesn’t need changing – even if it is officially ‘invalid’. In fact, some code I used in my old website was invalid but had essential effects on the pages in Internet Explorer and Firefox. In conclusion, do not treat what validation sites tell you as absolutely correct – they are more like a guide.

]]> By: Dark Fire http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-5225 Dark Fire Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:31:00 +0000 http://www.southanuk.co.uk/2006/09/29/joes-wtf-of-the-week/#comment-5225 Ah...Validation...I think that the validation sites are a load of rubbish. Just as people can understand incorrect uses of english, computers can easily cope with code that does not follow the rules 100% of the time. My policy is that if code works in Firefox and Internet Explorer, it doesn't need changing - even if it is officially 'invalid'. In fact, some code I used in my old website was invalid but had essential effects on the pages in Internet Explorer and Firefox. In conclusion, do not treat what validation sites tell you as absolutely correct - they are more like a guide. Ah…Validation…I think that the validation sites are a load of rubbish. Just as people can understand incorrect uses of english, computers can easily cope with code that does not follow the rules 100% of the time. My policy is that if code works in Firefox and Internet Explorer, it doesn’t need changing – even if it is officially ‘invalid’. In fact, some code I used in my old website was invalid but had essential effects on the pages in Internet Explorer and Firefox. In conclusion, do not treat what validation sites tell you as absolutely correct – they are more like a guide.

]]>